The Death Penalty - Just Punishment for Murder Essay -- Capital Punish

The Death Penalty - Just Punishment for Murder canvass has Problems with FormatThe death penalty has always been and stick arounds to be a very controversial issue. People on both sides of the issue argue endlessly to cod further support for their movements. While opponents of capital penalisation are quick to point out that the United States remains one of the few Western countries that continue to support the death penalty, Americans are likewise more likely to encounter violent crime than citizens of other countries (Brownlee 31). Justice mandates that criminals receive what they deserve. The punishment must foregather the crime. If a burglar deserves imprisonment, then a murderer deserves death (Winters 168). The death penalty is necessary and the only punishment suitable for those convicted of capital offenses. Seventy-five per centum of Americans support the death penalty, according to Turner, because it provides a deterrent to some would-be murderers and it also provide s for moral and legal justice (83). Deterrence is a theory It asks what the do are of a punishment (does it reduce the crime rate?) and makes testable predictions (punishment reduces the crime rate compared to what it would be without the credible threat of punishment), ( wagon train Den Haag 29). The deterrent effect of any punishment depends on how quickly the punishment is applied (Workshop 16). Executions are so rare and delayed for so long in comparison th the outlet of capitol offenses committed that statistical correlations cannot be expected (Winters 104). The number of potential murders that are deterred by the threat of a death penalty may never be known, just as it may never be known how many lives are saved with it. However, it is known that the death penalty does definitely deter those who are executed. Life in prison without the possibility of parole is the alternative to execution presented by those that consider words to be equal to reality. Nothing prevents the p eople sentenced in this way from being paroled under later laws or later court rulings. Furthermore, nothing prevents them from escaping or killing again while in prison. After all, if they take away already received the maximum sentence available, they have nothing to lose. For example, in 1972 the U.S. Supreme Court banished the death penalty. Like other states, Texas commuted all death sentences to deportment imprisonment. After being r... ...cibly take back what a robber took by force. It would be wrong to imprison someone that illegally imprisoned someone else. It would also be wrong for the police to drive over the speed limit to peruse someone who was speeding. The death penalty is a deserved and just punishment for murder. It does deter some murders, which saves an unknown number of innocent lives. These reasons are why, through all the controversy, three-quarters of Americans continue to support capital punishment. Works Cited The Bible. King James Version. Brownlee, Sha nnon, befool McGraw, and Jason Vest. The Place For Vengeance. U.S. News and World Reports 16 June 1997 24-32. Hartsburg, Hendrick. Burning Question. The New Republic 20 February 1989 4+. Norton, Mary, et al. A People and a Nation. Boston Houghton Mifflin Inc, 1990. Turner, Richard. Death-Penalty Taboos. Newsweek 30 June 1997 83. Van Den Haag, Earnest, and John Conrad. The Death Penalty A Debate. New York Plenum Press, 1997. Winters. Paul (ed.). The Death Penalty Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego Greenhaven Press Inc, 1997. Worsnop, Richard. Death Penalty Debate. CQ Researcher. Vol. 5. 10 border 1995 193-213.